#12662: Improve doctest coverage for sage.rings.qqbar
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Reporter: davidloeffler | Owner: mvngu
Type: defect | Status: positive_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.0
Component: doctest | Resolution:
Keywords: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers: Jim Stark
Authors: David Loeffler | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Changes (by JStarx):
* status: needs_review => positive_review
* reviewer: => Jim Stark
Comment:
Ok, it all looks good. The only minor tweek I would make is to delete the
commented stuff on lines 7594 - 7641. Not sure why that's there or why we
wouldn't delete it.
Anyway, I'm gonna set it as a positive review. If you agree that that
commented stuff can be deleted then feel free to keep the ticket marked as
a positive review after deleting it.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12662#comment:10>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
