#4735: Make e^A for A a generic matrix work
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Reporter: jason | Owner: burcin
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-5.0
Component: calculus | Resolution:
Keywords: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Comment (by kcrisman):
Ah. And the original posts apparently do refer only to changing for `E`.
Mike, are you saying this could cause a problem in this specific case, or
only if we did it more widely? It would be interesting to compare timings
for making this change; naturally, one could potentially have a ''lot'' of
`e^foo` in a given computation, so even microseconds spent checking
whether `foo` had a `exp()` method could add up, which I think is his
point... maybe?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4735#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
