#12812: Bug in summation of toric divisors
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: novoselt | Owner: AlexGhitza
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.0
Component: algebraic geometry | Resolution:
Keywords: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by vbraun):
The whole `ToricDivisor(X, int)` construction is a bit wonky. Thinking
about it, the fact that `ToricDivisor(X,0)` is not the trivial element in
this Abelian group is just confusing. I'd prefer to get rid of integer
arguments in it altogether, there are already enough ways to construct a
toric divisor. And you can always replace it with
`ToricDivisorGroup(X).gen(int)`, so its not like its a big loss. I'd like
to keep the convenience method `X.divisor(i)`, mind you. What do you
think?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12812#comment:2>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.