#12761: Givaro's (3.2.13.rc1) C++ headers don't conform to C++11
--------------------------------------------------------------+-------------
       Reporter:  leif                                        |         Owner:  
leif        
           Type:  defect                                      |        Status:  
needs_review
       Priority:  major                                       |     Milestone:  
sage-5.0    
      Component:  packages                                    |    Resolution:  
            
       Keywords:  C++11 GCC 4.7.0 CXXFLAGS -fpermissive spkg  |   Work issues:  
            
Report Upstream:  N/A                                         |     Reviewers:  
            
        Authors:  Leif Leonhardy                              |     Merged in:  
            
   Dependencies:                                              |      Stopgaps:  
            
--------------------------------------------------------------+-------------

Comment (by leif):

 Replying to [comment:9 ddrake]:
 > The new spkg actually builds and passes tests (such as they are) on
 skynet/cicero. I can give a positive review to everything

 Fine.

 > except your new header patches; they seem simple enough (almost all of
 it is just casting things to other types, right?) but I don't know enough
 C++ to be confident about that.

 Nope, I haven't added casts, but (roughly speaking) qualified the names of
 (mostly, I think) member functions used in ''template'' class member
 functions, i.e.,
 {{{
 #!c++
 template <class Foo>
 void Bar<Foo>::bar() // member function bar() of class Bar, which is
 parameterized by a class Foo
 {
     Bar<Foo>::baz(); // call with qualified [function] name;
                      // baz() here is [also] a member function of
 [template] class Bar
 }
 }}}
 instead of
 {{{
 #!c++
 ...
 {
     baz(); // call with unqualified [function] name
 }
 }}}
 I could have used
 {{{
 #!c++
 ...
 {
     this->baz();
 }
 }}}
 instead in most (if not all) cases as well; cf. Andrew Ohana's changes at
 #12444 (which I unfortunately found only after I made my own changes).

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12761#comment:10>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to