#12877: Categories for padics, schemes, and some more rings
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Reporter: nthiery | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.1
Component: categories | Resolution:
Keywords: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: Nicolas M. ThiƩry | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Comment (by nthiery):
Thanks for reproducing here my unsuccessful attempts :-)
Now is it worth the trouble? It's about the parent, not the elements. In
the similar situation for QQ we decided for QQ not to be an extension
type. It would be surprising if there would be methods on RLF that would
be more critical than on QQ, wouldn't it?
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12877#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.