#12891: Invite for contributing a doctest, if a user reads an untested function 
or
method
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
   Reporter:  SimonKing       |             Owner:  was                   
       Type:  PLEASE CHANGE   |            Status:  new                   
   Priority:  major           |         Milestone:  sage-5.1              
  Component:  user interface  |          Keywords:  documentation untested
Work issues:                  |   Report Upstream:  N/A                   
  Reviewers:                  |           Authors:                        
  Merged in:                  |      Dependencies:                        
   Stopgaps:                  |  
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
 On [http://groups.google.com/group/sage-
 devel/browse_thread/thread/aa60c0616ecdd1b6 sage-devel], Johan Grönqvist
 suggested to add a message when a function is called that has no doctest.
 The problem is that that would massively affect the performance.

 I suggested a modification of that idea: When the user reads the
 documentation of an untested function (or method) either in the notebook
 or the command line interface, s/he should be invited to contribute a
 test, such as
 {{{
 sage: def my_function(a,b):
 ....:     """
 ....:     some docs, but no test
 ....:     """
 ....:     return a+b
 ....:
 sage: my_function?
 Type:           function
 Base Class:     <type 'function'>
 String Form:    <function my_function at 0x7309938>
 Namespace:      Interactive
 Loaded File:    /mnt/local/king/SAGE/stable/sage-5.0.beta13/devel/sage-
 main/<ipython console>
 Source File:    /mnt/local/king/SAGE/stable/sage-5.0.beta13/devel/sage-
 main/<ipython console>
 Definition:     my_function(a, b)
 Docstring:
        ####
        # my_function appears to be untested.
        # The Sage community would appreciate if someone (e.g., you)
        # added a test to the documentation.
        ####
        some docs, but no test
 }}}

 Reading the documentation is certainly not critical for performance. I
 thought it could be implemented in sage/misc/sagedoc.py or
 sage/misc/sageinspect.py. Unfortunately, this only holds for the ipython
 interface of Sage. The notebook seems to use stuff in
 sagenb/misc/support.py and sagenb/misc/sageinspect.py (which is an '''
 ''outdated'' copy''' of sage/misc/sageinspect.py!).

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12891>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to