#12891: Invite for contributing a doctest, if a user reads an untested function
or
method
------------------------------------------+---------------------------------
Reporter: SimonKing | Owner: was
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.1
Component: user interface | Resolution:
Keywords: documentation untested | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
------------------------------------------+---------------------------------
Comment (by jhpalmieri):
By the way, would it make sense to eliminate the Sage version of
sageinspect.py, and just use the version from sagenb all the time? Since
sagenb is part of Sage, we would always have access to this file, but it
still allows sagenb to be a standalone project. (This requires updating
the version of sageinspect.py currently in sagenb, of course.)
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12891#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
