#12884: Fix problems introduced by remove_constraint functionality in MIP
----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Reporter: john_perry |
Owner: ncohen
Type: defect |
Status: needs_review
Priority: minor |
Milestone: sage-5.1
Component: linear programming |
Resolution:
Keywords: glpk, mixed integer programming, mip, linear programming |
Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Reviewers:
Authors: John Perry |
Merged in:
Dependencies: #12823 |
Stopgaps:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Comment (by ncohen):
Hello !!!!
> but it works pretty well for me right now in practice.
Good to know ! `:-)`
> Speaking of which, I noticed that the doctest coverage in sage/numerical
isn't quite at 100%, and some people have been talking about that. Shall I
try to complete that, and add it to this patch?
Oh.. Are we missing much there ? I thought I was careful when writing the
MILP classes `O_o`
I can not check right now as sage 5.0-rc0 is being compiled, but I hope
there is not much work to do. I would also like to see a proud 100% on
these files. If you feel like adding some documentation while working on
this patch please do, but leave some of the work, it would not be fair
otherwise `:-)`
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12884#comment:9>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
