#12925: Thematic tutorial on combinatorics
--------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: nthiery | Owner:
sage-combinat
Type: enhancement | Status:
needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.1
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: thematic tutorial | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers: Hugh
Thomas, Nicolas M. Thiéry
Authors: Nicolas M. Thiéry, Hugh Thomas | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
--------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Comment (by hthomas):
The previous issues are fixed either by me, or by Nicolas, except:
\dots in the source, not in math mode (eg. at line 113 of the tex source)
turns into nothing in the tutorial.
Partial orders on a set of 8 elements, up to isomorphism -- there is a
missing sage image output.
The link to \ref{exo.enumeration.arbres} doesn't work (line 517 of the tex
source).
Something bad happened in the conversion at line 757 in the tex source.
(In the tutorial, search for "We can now calculate coefficients much
further") Similar problem at line 846 of the source (search for "or, in a
more readable format".
line 860: \QQ didn't convert properly (maybe because it's within a \emph?)
line 906: display didn't convert properly. (Search for "In this simple
case".)
l. 2119: here, and elsewhere, it would be nice if the two consecutive
sageexamples were displayed without a break between them.
l. 2286: \command{cartesian\_product} didn't convert well.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12925#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
