#12944: Inconcistencies in the documentation of traveling_salesman_problem
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Reporter: ncohen | Owner: jason, ncohen, rlm
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.1
Component: graph theory | Resolution:
Keywords: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: | Merged in:
Dependencies: #12942 | Stopgaps:
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Changes (by kini):
* status: needs_review => needs_work
Comment:
This patch breaks the doctests of the function! So we need to edit those
doctests. But...
You said on #10497:
> Though if I remember correctly the french lines have been removed
recently in an unrelated patch by David Coudert `:-D`
Well, this patch is at least not merged in 5.0.rc1, since the French lines
in the docstring are still there - if I am to edit the doctests, I should
know where that patch is, so I don't conflict with it. But because the
patch is unrelated, I can't search for it - do you remember which patch it
is? (Here is an example of why one should keep unrelated changes out of
patches! :P)
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12944#comment:2>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
