#12952: DoubleStarSnark, FosterGraph, GrayGraph and HarriesGraph
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
       Reporter:  ncohen          |         Owner:  jason, ncohen, rlm
           Type:  enhancement     |        Status:  needs_review      
       Priority:  major           |     Milestone:  sage-5.1          
      Component:  graph theory    |    Resolution:                    
       Keywords:                  |   Work issues:                    
Report Upstream:  N/A             |     Reviewers:  Keshav Kini       
        Authors:  Nathann Cohen   |     Merged in:                    
   Dependencies:  #12942, #12945  |      Stopgaps:                    
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------

Comment (by ncohen):

 > About the order, I didn't mean about your patch specifically (though
 your patch is also not following alphabetic order - D comes after C! :P )
 - I mean the whole file. I mean, why is `HarriesGraph` at the top of the
 file but `DoubleStarSnark` is under "Named Graphs"? It seems like the top
 of the file was originally for small graphs that are commonly used as
 components in other graphs, or something like that, but I guess
 `HarriesGraph` probably doesn't have that property, right? Etc. etc.

 Oh, right... When I want to add a function I usually do a search thrpugh
 the file to find the definition of the previous function, and I add mine
 afterwards. But honestly I do not think that not having them sorted really
 is a problem. Python sure does not mine and you find the line you are
 looking for through a text search, and not by scrolling through the file
 sooooo `^^;`

 > By the way, [http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/#other-
 recommendations PEP 8 recommends] putting no spaces around "=" when
 defining default arguments in function definitions:

 Ahah. Lawyers. Well, on my side I do not mind as long as the code compiles
 and is somehow readable, I will try to conform a bit more to this fanciful
 "PEP8" when what it says makes some sense, and you are free to change my
 code however you like -- you may follow these weird rules but your code is
 nice in the end, so why not ? `:-)`

 Nathann

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12952#comment:12>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to