#10527: Implementation of quiver mutation type
-----------------------------------------------+----------------------------
       Reporter:  stumpc5                      |         Owner:  sage-combinat
           Type:  enhancement                  |        Status:  needs_review 
       Priority:  major                        |     Milestone:  sage-5.1     
      Component:  combinatorics                |    Resolution:               
       Keywords:  quiver mutation type days38  |   Work issues:               
Report Upstream:  N/A                          |     Reviewers:  Hugh Thomas  
        Authors:  Christian Stump              |     Merged in:               
   Dependencies:  #10349                       |      Stopgaps:               
-----------------------------------------------+----------------------------

Comment (by hthomas):

 Replying to [comment:61 stumpc5]:
 > We had a discussion on quivers in cluster algebra and in representation
 theory, see #12630. We decided in the end, that we will rename our quivers
 for clusters to combinatorial_quivers (since they can be mutated and
 stuff, which doesn't make any sense for quivers as input for path
 algebras).
 >

 Thanks for pointing me to #12630.

 I'm not really seeing the logic of what is being done here (well, really I
 mean #10538) vs what is being done there vs what is now being done both
 places.  I realize that you and Jim Stark didn't sit down and plan this
 out a year ago!  But to me, at this point, it doesn't make sense to have
 two different sets of code in Sage implementing the same things.  There is
 some functionality which you have which he doesn't (eg, reflection
 functors), as well as functionality which he has and you don't, and I
 think the right thing to do is to think about merging.

 This suggestion isn't intended to impact any of the cluster algebra code,
 which has a different orientation and solves a different set of problems
 (in particular, I get it that in cluster algebras, it's most natural to
 have mutable quivers, while Jim wants immutable quivers).

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10527#comment:62>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to