#12950: update to Pynac 0.2.4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Reporter: burcin
| Owner: burcin
Type: defect
| Status: needs_review
Priority: major
| Milestone: sage-5.1
Component: symbolics
| Resolution:
Keywords: pynac
| Work issues: review spkg, correct some typos in the
patches
Report Upstream: N/A
| Reviewers: Jean-Pierre Flori
Authors: Volker Braun, Burcin Erocal, Jean-Pierre Flori, Titus
Nicolae, Alexei Sheplyakov | Merged in:
Dependencies:
| Stopgaps:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Comment (by jpflori):
I've just uploaded a fix for the revolution_plot3d problem.
When the revolution axis goes through (0,0,0), the previous behaviour was
correct although obtained through the general formula which in fact should
not have made sense.
In fact the (0,0,0) case is the simplest one, no "complicated" formula for
the to be drawn surface has to be deduced from the curve formula.
The proposed fix is to treat the special case (0,0,0) separately as far as
the phase calculation is concerned.
(PS: We posted more or less at the same time, so this post might seem
strange)
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12950#comment:11>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
