#12950: update to Pynac 0.2.4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
       Reporter:  burcin                                                        
                    |         Owner:  burcin                                    
    
           Type:  defect                                                        
                    |        Status:  new                                       
    
       Priority:  major                                                         
                    |     Milestone:  sage-5.1                                  
    
      Component:  symbolics                                                     
                    |    Resolution:                                            
    
       Keywords:  pynac                                                         
                    |   Work issues:  review spkg, correct some typos in the 
patches
Report Upstream:  N/A                                                           
                    |     Reviewers:  Jean-Pierre Flori                         
    
        Authors:  Volker Braun, Burcin Erocal, Jean-Pierre Flori, Titus 
Nicolae, Alexei Sheplyakov  |     Merged in:                                    
            
   Dependencies:                                                                
                    |      Stopgaps:                                            
    
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Comment (by jpflori):

 Oh, so now I'm a little lost.
 Some patches are included here and other on the original tickets...
 It's surely logical, but I just discovered that.

 Anyway, the dependencies between the tickets should be clearly stated and
 written into the corresponding trac field.
 For example, do we really want to merge #11919 now? cos I don't think
 reviewing this ticket will take ages...
 Or, this ticket can not be merged without fixing the atan2 stuff causing
 failures in revolution_plot3d which is in fact also mentioned in the
 comments of #11423 .
 Or, do we really want the three lines patch of #11155 there with #12950 as
 a dependency rather than here?

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12950#comment:9>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to