#12449: Improve the way that sage evaluates symbolic functions on basic types
-------------------------------------------------+--------------------------
Reporter: bober | Owner: bober
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.1
Component: symbolics | Resolution:
Keywords: gamma function | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers: Burcin
Erocal, Jonathan Bober
Authors: Jonathan Bober, Burcin Erocal | Merged in:
Dependencies: #4498, #12507, #9130 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------------------+--------------------------
Comment (by bober):
Ok, here is a version that should quiet those numerical errors. I'm
leaving this as need review for the moment instead of putting it back to
positive review in case someone wants to revisit the issue of whether or
not we might want to make sure that we don't return different results on
different machines.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12449#comment:21>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
