#12839: reduced Groebner basis not unique
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
       Reporter:  mariah               |         Owner:  malb    
           Type:  defect               |        Status:  new     
       Priority:  major                |     Milestone:  sage-5.1
      Component:  commutative algebra  |    Resolution:          
       Keywords:                       |   Work issues:          
Report Upstream:  N/A                  |     Reviewers:          
        Authors:                       |     Merged in:          
   Dependencies:                       |      Stopgaps:          
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------

Comment (by john_perry):

 Correct me if I am wrong, but you cannot have a reduced Groebner basis
 over a field that is not a ring. Besides, the ideals are ''not'' the same,
 even if their varieties are.

 Singular seems to feel this way:

   * Singular is computing the basis.
   * According to Remark 1.6.14 in ''A '''Singular''' Introduction to
 Commutative Algebra'', if you want to compute a ''standard basis over a
 ring'' which is merely Noetherian (not necessarily a field, as in
 Definition 1.6.1), you need to have agreement of leading ''terms'' (which
 includes coefficients), not leading ''monomials''.
   * See this answer in [http://www.singular.uni-
 kl.de/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=1750&p=2349&hilit=std+integer#p2349 the
 Singular forums].

 Macaulay also feels this way:

   * I installed Macaulay2, computed groebner bases for both I and J, and
 got the same thing singular computes.
   * Macaulay2's
 
[http://www.math.uiuc.edu/Macaulay2/doc/Macaulay2-1.4/share/doc/Macaulay2/Macaulay2Doc/html/_simple_sp__Groebner_spbasis_spcomputations_spover_spvarious_springs.html
 webpage] implies the same.

 Unless I'm wrong, this is not a bug.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12839#comment:1>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to