#9759: Addition of SI prefixes capabilities to the units module
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Reporter: cousteau | Owner: burcin
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: trivial | Milestone: sage-5.1
Component: symbolics | Resolution:
Keywords: sd40.5 | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: Javier Mora | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Changes (by kcrisman):
* keywords: => sd40.5
* status: needs_review => needs_work
Comment:
I agree with Burcin that this is a bit hackish.
> The truth is that this patch was created as a suggestion done in #sage-
devel; it was done pretty fast and probably not elegantly. I later
submitted another patch with a better implementation (see ticket #9778),
which also added the basics for `LaTeX` representation of the units.
So should this be closed in favor of #9778?
Also,
{{{
def _add_si_property_(prefix):
setattr(UnitExpression, prefix, property(lambda self:
self._si_prefix_(prefix)))
for prefix in unitdict['si_prefixes']:
_add_si_property_(prefix)
}}}
seems to be missing a doctest in the underscore function.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9759#comment:6>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
