#12802: test containment of ideals in class MPolynomialIdeal
--------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: mariah | Owner: AlexGhitza
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-5.1
Component: algebra | Resolution:
Keywords: sd40.5, groebner bases, ideals | Work issues:
documentation
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers: Andrey
Novoseltsev
Authors: John Perry | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
--------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Comment (by john_perry):
Replying to [comment:13 novoselt]:
> I think comparison of rings should be done by converting all to a single
system where they will be unique.
This has to be checked, due to different term orders. I've encountered
regressions because of this; they may be the cause of some of your failing
doctests.
> Note also that there are many failing doctests, the worst ones are with
infinite recursion.
I think I've fixed this one, too; I think the cause was related to
returning numbers. I'm about to upload a new patch.
I wasn't getting any failures in `sage/rings`, btw, so I guess your
failures are elsewhere?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12802#comment:14>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
