#12930: Poset of Alternating sign matrices
-------------------------------------------------------------+--------------
       Reporter:  aschilling                                 |         Owner:  
sage-combinat                    
           Type:  enhancement                                |        Status:  
needs_work                       
       Priority:  major                                      |     Milestone:  
sage-5.1                         
      Component:  combinatorics                              |    Resolution:   
                                
       Keywords:  alternating sign matrices, posets, days38  |   Work issues:   
                                
Report Upstream:  N/A                                        |     Reviewers:  
Frederic Chapoton, Anne Schilling
        Authors:  Pierre Cagne                               |     Merged in:   
                                
   Dependencies:                                             |      Stopgaps:   
                                
-------------------------------------------------------------+--------------

Comment (by PierreCagne):

 > Could you point me to the line in your code? I think if you use
 > {{{
 >     ...
 > }}}
 > instead of
 > {{{
 >     ...:
 > }}}
 > it should work.

 Yes, that is the trick explained in #10458. But this is definitely
 something to fix : we want to be able to copy/paste our tests from the
 sage shell.


 > I noticed that sometimes you do not repeat a definition (for example of
 A) from one doctest to the next. Is this the problem when you remove the
 offending doctest?

 Yes, it was careless mistakes. I fixed it.


 > Most likely skipping them is ok. Perhaps confirm this with Nicolas.

 I think it is better too. I will contact Nicolas about that.


 > Don't we want to get rid of the name contre-tableaux at some point? I
 was thinking of deprecating that name, so that at some point there would
 only be monotone_triangles.

 Well, yes. I was just thinking about compatibility with older code. But I
 can switch to monotone triangles only (or at least default) and go through
 a deprecation cycle.

 > Yes, both are tested. For myself, I usually use EXAMPLES if these are
 tests that are also useful for the user to read to understand how the code
 is used. TESTS is for internal tests like in __init__ or something like
 this or corner cases that need to be checked, but not necessarily read.

 Ok, thanks. I see now.

 Pierre

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12930#comment:12>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to