#12930: Poset of Alternating sign matrices
-------------------------------------------------------------+--------------
       Reporter:  aschilling                                 |         Owner:  
sage-combinat                    
           Type:  enhancement                                |        Status:  
needs_work                       
       Priority:  major                                      |     Milestone:  
sage-5.1                         
      Component:  combinatorics                              |    Resolution:   
                                
       Keywords:  alternating sign matrices, posets, days38  |   Work issues:   
                                
Report Upstream:  N/A                                        |     Reviewers:  
Frederic Chapoton, Anne Schilling
        Authors:  Pierre Cagne                               |     Merged in:   
                                
   Dependencies:                                             |      Stopgaps:   
                                
-------------------------------------------------------------+--------------

Comment (by aschilling):

 Replying to [comment:12 PierreCagne]:
 >  > Could you point me to the line in your code? I think if you use
 > > {{{
 > >     ...
 > > }}}
 > > instead of
 > > {{{
 > >     ...:
 > > }}}
 > > it should work.
 >
 > Yes, that is the trick explained in #10458. But this is definitely
 something to fix : we want to be able to copy/paste our tests from the
 sage shell.

 Sure, but the above works and you can use it for now for your patch to get
 the tests to pass!

 > > I noticed that sometimes you do not repeat a definition (for example
 of A) from one doctest to the next. Is this the problem when you remove
 the offending doctest?
 >
 > Yes, it was careless mistakes. I fixed it.

 Did you post your new patch? When you do, could you please also put the
 new version on the sage-combinat server (well, if it is too complicated
 for you, I can do it, but it is easier to review this way for me).

 > > Don't we want to get rid of the name contre-tableaux at some point? I
 was thinking of deprecating that name, so that at some point there would
 only be monotone_triangles.
 >
 > Well, yes. I was just thinking about compatibility with older code. But
 I can switch to monotone triangles only (or at least default) and go
 through a deprecation cycle.

 Yes, I think we should start the deprecation cycle.

 Best wishes,

 Anne

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12930#comment:13>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to