#12415: Update doctesting framework
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Reporter: robertwb
| Owner: mvngu
Type: enhancement
| Status: needs_review
Priority: major
| Milestone: sage-5.1
Component: doctest
| Resolution:
Keywords:
| Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A
| Reviewers: Jeroen Demeyer
Authors: David Roe, Robert Bradshaw
| Merged in:
Dependencies: #13147,#13146, #13145, #12723, #12392, #12393, #12395,
#12396, #12397, #12381, #12382, #12383, #12384 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Comment (by jdemeyer):
The following is cut from a `make ptest` run:
{{{
sage -t devel/sage/sage/symbolic/expression.pyx
[1960 tests, 38.2 s]
sage -t
devel/sage/sage/pl**********************************************************************
File "sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.ell_rational_field", line 1468, in
sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.ell_rational_field.EllipticCurve_ration
al_field.simon_two_descent
Failed example:
E.simon_two_descent() # long time (9s on sage.math, 2011)
Expected:
(5, 5, [(5 : 8 : 1), (4 : 9 : 1), (3 : 11 : 1), (-1 : 20 : 1), (-6 :
-25 : 1)])
Got:
Saturation index bound = 265
WARNING: saturation at primes p > 97 will not be done;
points may be unsaturated at primes between 97 and index bound
Failed to saturate MW basis at primes [ ]
Saturation index bound = 265
WARNING: saturation at primes p > 199 will not be done;
points may be unsaturated at primes between 199 and index bound
Failed to saturate MW basis at primes [ ]
(5, 5, [(5 : 8 : 1), (4 : 9 : 1), (3 : 11 : 1), (-1 : 20 : 1), (-6 :
-25 : 1)])
**********************************************************************
1 items had failures:
1 of 38 in
sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.ell_rational_field.EllipticCurve_rational_field.simon_two_descent
***Test Failed*** 1 failures.
ot/plot3d/implicit_plot3d.py
[57 tests, 26.9 s]
sage -t devel/sage/sage/modular/modsym/ambient.py
[397 tests, 26.4 s]
}}}
There are 3 issues:
1. The doctest failure itself.
2. The fact that it's tested when the test is marked `# long time` but the
`--long` option is not given.
3. Output flushing: note the
{{{
sage -t devel/sage/sage/pl
}}}
and then later
{{{
ot/plot3d/implicit_plot3d.py
[57 tests, 26.9 s]
}}}
By all means please keep working on this, it already looks very cool!
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12415#comment:55>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
