#13126: Update and clean up openssl
-------------------------------------------------+--------------------------
       Reporter:  jhpalmieri                     |         Owner:  tbd          
                                     
           Type:  enhancement                    |        Status:  needs_review 
                                     
       Priority:  major                          |     Milestone:  sage-5.1     
                                     
      Component:  optional packages              |    Resolution:               
                                     
       Keywords:  openssl                        |   Work issues:               
                                     
Report Upstream:  N/A                            |     Reviewers:  Jeroen 
Demeyer, John Palmieri, Karl-Dieter Crisman
        Authors:  John Palmieri, Jeroen Demeyer  |     Merged in:               
                                     
   Dependencies:                                 |      Stopgaps:               
                                     
-------------------------------------------------+--------------------------
Changes (by {'newvalue': u'John Palmieri, Jeroen Demeyer', 'oldvalue': u'John 
Palmieri'}):

  * reviewer:  => Jeroen Demeyer, John Palmieri, Karl-Dieter Crisman
  * author:  John Palmieri => John Palmieri, Jeroen Demeyer


Comment:

 > > I assume that this will be an ''optional'' spkg, only needed if one's
 computer doesn't have openssl dev "headers" and wants to build from
 scratch and/or use the OpenID logins?
 > OpenSSL would be ''required'' both to build and run Sage.  The spkg is
 optional only in the sense that you don't need it if the operating system
 provides it.  Since OpenSSL is truly ''required'' for Sage, it's dubious
 that Sage is obeying the GPL, but IANAL.
 Right, I just meant that under ordinary circumstances this spkg would not
 be required.

 ----

 This actually takes a while to build, I'm a little surprised... did it
 overwrite my existing openssl headers, by the way?  Hopefully that
 wouldn't be a problem :(

 Built ok on OS X 10.6 Intel and OS X 10.4 PPC.  I did not run self-tests,
 pursuant to John's comment above and since it's an optional spkg.

 So I guess it's ok that {{{-fno-common:-arch ppc}}} and friends are still
 in there, since it worked?  I notice that in the
 {{{"darwin64-x86_64-cc"}}} line, all references to `arch` were removed...
 ----

 What is the status here?  John tested the Solaris patch from Jeroen.  If
 Jeroen tested on Lion, then this should be mostly okay, possibly except my
 comment about `arch` and slight changing of the spkg-install (probably
 pointless).

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13126#comment:13>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to