#12415: Update doctesting framework
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Reporter: robertwb
| Owner: mvngu
Type: enhancement
| Status: needs_review
Priority: major
| Milestone: sage-5.1
Component: doctest
| Resolution:
Keywords:
| Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A
| Reviewers: Jeroen Demeyer
Authors: David Roe, Robert Bradshaw
| Merged in:
Dependencies: #13147,#13146, #13145, #12723, #12392, #12393, #12395,
#12396, #12397, #12381, #12382, #12383, #12384 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Comment (by roed):
Replying to [comment:80 jdemeyer]:
> Replying to [comment:65 roed]:
> > Replying to [comment:60 jdemeyer]:
> > > What does the `--serial` option do and how is it different from `-p
1`?
> >
> > The `-p 1` has one worker: there's another thread which collates and
prints answers. `-p 1` is the default.
> I suppose you mean "process", not thread? Still, I don't see the point
of `--serial`.
The main point of `--serial` is that it allows you to debug problems in
the doctesting framework without worrying about multiprocessing. :-)
I'm fine making it less prominent (having it not show up in the help
display for `sage -t` for example, and not using it for `--verbose` mode).
But I think it should stick around since it currently exists, and it makes
some kinds of bugs much easier to track down.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12415#comment:81>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
