#9547: x * Infinity assumes that x is positive
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Reporter: fredrik.johansson | Owner: burcin
Type: defect | Status: positive_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.2
Component: symbolics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers: Burcin Erocal
Authors: Volker Braun | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Comment (by kcrisman):
> > Patch is at #12950, but still a valid ticket; that was a meta-ticket
for the Pynac upgrade.
> Same question as #1861: why doesn't this count as
duplicate/invalid/wontfix?
In my opinion (only?), tickets that are closed by metatickets are not
duplicates. It seems better to me (only?) to make it clear that work went
into all of the issues we close, instead of making it seem like we have
hundreds of duplicates that people open. We already ''do'' have enough
duplicates as it is :)
And we certainly fixed it, so it's not "wontfix", and it's not invalid
either, or at least wasn't before #12950, which however, explicitly refers
to this ticket - it's not like some other change in #12950 made this
invalid, which does sometimes happen.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9547#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.