#9547: x * Infinity assumes that x is positive
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Reporter: fredrik.johansson | Owner: burcin
Type: defect | Status: positive_review
Priority: major | Milestone:
sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
Component: symbolics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers: Burcin Erocal, Volker
Braun
Authors: | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Changes (by kcrisman):
* reviewer: Burcin Erocal => Burcin Erocal, Volker Braun
* milestone: sage-5.2 => sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
* author: Volker Braun =>
Comment:
> You could give credit to those people on the other gigantic metaticket.
Which Burcin did. The point was that although a ticket isn't a great
measure of work, we don't have to make it an even worse measure.
> On this particular ticket here, I don't see any work done, so I would
simply close it as duplicate.
Well, I was going by the fact that someone else filled in author and
reviewer fields and the work "just happened" to be there; see also the
discussion at #12950. But if you insist, I suppose I've engaged in enough
bikeshedding for one day.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9547#comment:12>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
