#12120: Improve documentation of numerical_approx()
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Reporter: saraedum | Owner: mvngu
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: trivial | Milestone: sage-5.3
Component: documentation | Resolution:
Keywords: beginner | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers: Eviatar Bach, Karl-Dieter
Crisman
Authors: Julian Rueth | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Changes (by kcrisman):
* reviewer: => Eviatar Bach, Karl-Dieter Crisman
Comment:
I like the following reviewer patch; to me, it clarifies one or two
things. If you think I've misstated them, let me know. If it's fine with
you, then click positive review!
Also, I think that #11647 probably should count as a dup of this. My
guess is that there is no way to ensure at least one correct digit without
occasionally bringing along a second for the ride.
Eviatar, feel free to open that sanity check ticket as well.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12120#comment:15>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
