#8899: Implement non commutative symmetric functions
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Reporter: nthiery
| Owner: sage-combinat
Type: enhancement
| Status: needs_review
Priority: major
| Milestone: sage-wishlist
Component: combinatorics
| Resolution:
Keywords: sd40
| Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A
| Reviewers:
Authors: Jason Bandlow, Chris Berg, Franco Saliola, Nicolas M. Thiéry
| Merged in:
Dependencies: #12953, #12956, #12959, #13238, #13243
| Stopgaps:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Comment (by saliola):
Hello Mike,
Thank you very much for your review, and your improvements to the
documentation!
I folded all the patches that you've seen, including your patch. And I
created one more that makes changes to the documentation, adds some
doctests, etc.
''So please review this last patch: [attachment:trac_11929_8899
-additional_documentation-fs.patch].''
Here is a summary of the changes:
- I noticed that some of the bases of NCSF and QSym had no documentation
when one asks for the documentation using the command:
{{{NCSF.Ribbon?}}}
So I fixed that for all the bases.
- In a few places, you used the letter F to refer to an arbitrary quasi-
symmetric function. Since this is the prefix for the Fundamental basis, I
decided to change this to another letter (I used H).
- I made a some changes to your tutorial that I hope improve the
exposition.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8899#comment:25>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
