Ok, I've gone ahead with the plan. See http://www.telscenter.org/jira/browse/PAS-508 and http://fisheye3.cenqua.com/changelog/tels/?cs=2136 .
So now curnits spit out by the converter have just ONE pod. All the beans go in there. When we figure out a workable system for reuse, we can add it in then. The ProjectConverter has a boolean flag for whether to *share* the pod among all the beans or let them each have their own. Right now it's settable only in code, since we should be careful about switching that flag. I made the PasCurnitUtils so it can tell the difference between sharing pods and individual pods, but I haven't been able to test it thoroughly. Tony, I hope you can add more tests to PasCurnitUtilsTest. Good work on making that. I'll write in the other thread on the move methods. On Jul 19, 6:40 pm, "Anthony Perritano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > right on. i think it will make it easier to built better tools, debug pod > serialization problems..etc yes our original reuse plan kinda fades away. > but maybe we should think about reuse on the bean level, if such a thing can > be done. > > -Tony > > On 7/19/07, Turadg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Tony and other Pas developers, please take a look at this proposal and > > let me know what you think. Particularly, what are your concerns? > > I'll try to address them. > > >http://www.telscenter.org/confluence/display/PAS/Proposal+for+one+pod... > > > -t --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SAIL-Dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/SAIL-Dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
