Turadg wrote: > Excellent points Scott. I'm not much in the loop anymore and was > soliciting such issues in my proposal e-mail last week. I got one > affirmative reply and a few days of silence, which I thought was > consent. But as I think about it, I sent it Thursday evening so that > basically worked out to just one whole workday, Friday. > Yeah one day isn't enough for me. > Of course, this "one pod" simplification then isn't so simple. I made > the change to make it easier for Tony to develop the authoring tool > within hitting snags in working with pods. Given the learner data > issues you point out, I think the trade-off isn't worth it. So please > go ahead and flip that boolean in the WISE Project Converter. I'd do > it myself except I'm not at my dev machine right now and it would be > good for someone else to see that code. > Ok, I flipped it to false. > Scott, can you also write back to the Replacing XMLEncoder thread? > Maybe we can improve pods sooner than later. > Yes...
Scott --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SAIL-Dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/SAIL-Dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
