first think, then mail everyone would get every hour the status.
sorry for this stupid suggestion. Michael > -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Klug, Michael > Gesendet am: Donnerstag, 5. September 2002 13:44 > An: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Betreff: AW: [SA-list] > > maybe it's possible to solve the problem at this way: > > The person's scheduler is splitted to full hours for smtp and pager > notification. > Every full hour a routine can query the status of the hosts and > 'simulates' SA a status change when the status is down. > > Michael > > > -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Dirk Bulinckx [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Gesendet am: Donnerstag, 5. September 2002 13:23 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: RE: [SA-list] > > This would mean that for each person we would have to keep a queue > for each > entry...don't think we're going to do that. > > Don't forget to vote for Servers Alive in the annual Sunbelt Target > Awards > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/targetawards/ > > > dirk. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of Jack Lyons (Martin Agency) > Sent: Thu Sep 05 12:31 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SA-list] > > > can you keep track of the state between don't send times...i.e. at > 5pm when > the send option period ends...you have 3 hosts down. at 6am when > the send > option period starts, salive looks at the state at 5pm and compares > it to > the current status, and emails the difference. > > Jack > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dirk Bulinckx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 5:18 AM > Subject: RE: [SA-list] > > > > that would mean going over all entry's and rechecking all people > that are > > within the alerts. > > Also the "don't alert" thing can be different for each person, so > when > > should we check it? > > > > Don't forget to vote for Servers Alive in the annual Sunbelt > Target Awards > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/targetawards/ > > > > > > dirk. > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > > Behalf Of David Walters > > Sent: Thu Sep 05 11:14 AM > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > Subject: RE: [SA-list] > > > > > > why cant you do a speical check when "dont alert" time has > finished . im > not > > sure how you can do it.. but perhaps a status check? > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dirk Bulinckx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, 5 September 2002 5:10 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: [SA-list] > > > > > > If the entry went down during the "don't alert" time it looks like > it got > > dropped yes, but basicly SA sends the message to the address/phone > you > > defined and if within that definition you say that it should send > during > > specific hours that's what it does, just doesn't send it. > > Don't think queing is a solution in this. > > You could have different aler and different outputs, each showing > a > correct > > status, you will have to use those too. > > > > > > Don't forget to vote for Servers Alive in the annual Sunbelt > Target Awards > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/targetawards/ > > > > > > dirk. > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > > Behalf Of Klug, Michael > > Sent: Thu Sep 05 11:05 AM > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > Subject: AW: [SA-list] > > > > > > I see the problem. > > SA drops the message in the 'don't alert' cycle. > > What we need is that SA queues the messages and deletes the > messages when > > the host comes up in the 'don't alert' cyle from the queue and > sends the > > queued messages at the end of the 'don't alert' cycle. > > > > > > > -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- > > > Von: Dirk Bulinckx [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Gesendet am: Donnerstag, 5. September 2002 10:16 > > > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Betreff: RE: [SA-list] > > > > > > SA is checking all the time. > > > If you set SA to alert (paging for example) on status change it > will try > > > to > > > send the page when the status change, however if due to the > schedule of > > > the > > > person that you're sending the page too SA isn't allowed to send > the > page, > > > the page won't be send. On a next down situation (next cycle or > the 50 > > > cycle further when the entry is still down), SA will see that it > only > has > > > to > > > send on status change and won't try to send. SA will first > check the > > > "send > > > option" (status change, all downs, after 5 downs or whatever you > have > > > set), > > > if it has to send it will send. And during the send SA will > convert the > > > team/person name(s) to addresses/phonenumbers and at that time > it could > be > > > that due to a persons schedule that it get's no address/phone > back and > > > thus > > > doesn't send. > > > > > > > > > Don't forget to vote for Servers Alive in the annual Sunbelt > Target > Awards > > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/targetawards/ > > > > > > > > > dirk. > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > > > Behalf Of David Walters > > > Sent: Thu Sep 05 10:03 AM > > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > > Subject: RE: [SA-list] > > > > > > > > > wouldnt it be better servered for SA to recheck them when the > 'dont > alert' > > > has finished tho within SA? > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Klug, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Thursday, 5 September 2002 2:55 PM > > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > > Subject: AW: [SA-list] > > > > > > > > > I've the same prob. > > > I'm using this workaround: > > > After the non paging cycle i kill the sa-process and open sa > again using > a > > > task scheduler. > > > It works fine if you have not a lot of non paging cycles for > different > > > hosts. Only your down/up statistics are wrong. > > > > > > Michael > > > > > > Michael Klug > > > Lufthansa AirPlus Servicekarten GmbH > > > Network & Internet Services > > > Dornhofstr. 36 > > > 63263 Neu-Isenburg > > > > Phone: +49 (0) 61 02 204-220 > > > > Fax: +49 (0) 61 02 204-759 > > > > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Internet: www.airplus.com > > > > > > > > -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- > > > > Von: David Walters [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Gesendet am: Donnerstag, 5. September 2002 07:51 > > > > An: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > > > Betreff: RE: [SA-list] > > > > > > > > 'dont alert for these times' > > > > > > > > Id like SA to send a message if the service is down once the > 'dont > alert > > > > for > > > > these times' has finished > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Dirk Bulinckx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Thursday, 5 September 2002 1:17 PM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: RE: [SA-list] > > > > > > > > > > > > What send option are you using? > > > > > > > > You mean that if SA goes down in the non-paging hours, and is > still > down > > > > during the paging hours that you would like to get a page? > That's not > > > > possible (except if it has to page you on all down cycles) > You could > > > > however using another alert type during these other hours. > > > > > > > > Don't forget to vote for Servers Alive in the annual Sunbelt > Target > > > Awards > > > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/targetawards/ > > > > > > > > > > > > dirk. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > > > > Behalf Of David Walters > > > > Sent: Thu Sep 05 5:45 AM > > > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > > > Subject: [SA-list] > > > > > > > > > > > > Currently I have SA alertin me when the server is down via sms > between > > > > certain hours... say 6pm-9pm now if the server goes down > between > the > > > > hours of 9pm-7am I have to remind myself to check. > > > > > > > > is there a way to get SA to alert me if still down when the > hours are > > > back > > > > to 7am - 6pm ? > > > > To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > With the following in the body of the message: > > > > unsubscribe SAlive > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > With the following in the body of the message: > > > > unsubscribe SAlive > > > > To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > With the following in the body of the message: > > > > unsubscribe SAlive > > > > > > To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > With the following in the body of the message: > > > unsubscribe SAlive > > > To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > With the following in the body of the message: > > > unsubscribe SAlive > > > > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > With the following in the body of the message: > > > unsubscribe SAlive > > > > To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > With the following in the body of the message: > > unsubscribe SAlive > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > With the following in the body of the message: > > unsubscribe SAlive > > To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > With the following in the body of the message: > > unsubscribe SAlive > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > With the following in the body of the message: > > unsubscribe SAlive > > > > To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > With the following in the body of the message: > unsubscribe SAlive > > > > To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > With the following in the body of the message: > unsubscribe SAlive To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive
