Not really, I actually cheat.  It's not a check per se.  It's a batch file, that runs 
an app, then depending on the result returned from the app, the batch file modifies a 
text file that is published by a www server.  As such, I don't actually care about 
what SA thinks of the result, I don't even have it published on any SA pages, I 
actually use SA as a scheduler, of sorts, to run this batch file.  it is run locally, 
by an admin equivalent user.  simple as that.

for the curious, here is what this does, and why.

I am, like many, multi-homed.  Also like many of us, I live for stats.  therefore, I 
want to know which of my links is  being used, and in what proportion.

so I have a batch file that:

1) runs a traceroute to a host statically routed through routerA
2) analyse the output of that traceroute to see if I find routerA+hop1
3) if so, increment counter for linkA (simple text file published in a frame on a www 
server)
4) if not, increment counter for linkB (ditto)
5) exit

The process actually works, even when SA thinks the check is unavailable for the 1st 
time....




________________________
Roland Gaspar
Tel.: (514) 398-7880 xt 8603
ICQ # 1355591
www.patlq.com/~roland



>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/10/02 1:57:24 PM >>>
Do you need any special security to do the check

Is it a gui/service issue

Doug Woznicki

-----Original Message-----
From: Roland Gaspar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 1:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject: RE: [SA-list] 1st time around check unavailable

Nope.. every cycle, schedule is green...




________________________
Roland Gaspar
Tel.: (514) 398-7880 xt 8603
ICQ # 1355591
www.patlq.com/~roland 



>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/10/02 1:51:43 PM >>>
Do you have it checking every x out of x times? Or on a schedule?

-----Original Message-----
From: Roland Gaspar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 12:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject: RE: [SA-list] 1st time around check unavailable

For two out of the three, this is the case, however, the errorlevel check
has no dependencies (or dependents even)




________________________
Roland Gaspar
Tel.: (514) 398-7880 xt 8603
ICQ # 1355591
www.patlq.com/~roland 



>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/10/02 12:58:02 PM >>>
Are they dependent on a check that's lower in the list?

Andrew Everhart
Conseco IT Automation
317-817-4042 (work)
888-506-5409 (pager)


-----Original Message-----
From: Roland Gaspar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 11:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject: [SA-list] 1st time around check unavailable


Hi there, I know this question has been covered, but I can't find the
answer... I have 3 checks (ouf of 90) that, on the 1st cycle only, show up
as unavailable.  This happens every time I restart SA, so not often, but
still, affects my stats.  2 of these are nt process checks, and the other
one is an errorlevel check.  Again, these 3 (out of 90) fail the 1st time
only.  If I stop SA and have it wait for a few minutes, then start all
checks, they will still fail, so I don't think it's a timing issue.
Although I just upgraded to the newest release this AM, this has been
hapenning for a few versions now, had just forgotten about it, as I don't
restart SA often enough for it to be a bother.. but it's fresh in my mind
now... getting old.. you know...

Thanks,




________________________
Roland Gaspar
Tel.: (514) 398-7880 xt 8603
ICQ # 1355591
www.patlq.com/~roland 





xxx
Ce message a �t� analys� par GUINEVERE2 et McAfee
This file was Scanned by GUINEVERE2 and McAfee
http://cheese.patlq.com/guinevere.htm 
Questions? [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
xxx

To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
With the following in the body of the message:
   unsubscribe SAlive



xxx
Ce message a �t� analys� par GUINEVERE2 et McAfee
This file was Scanned by GUINEVERE2 and McAfee
http://cheese.patlq.com/guinevere.htm 
Questions? [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
xxx

To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
With the following in the body of the message:
   unsubscribe SAlive
To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
With the following in the body of the message:
   unsubscribe SAlive



xxx
Ce message a �t� analys� par GUINEVERE2 et McAfee
This file was Scanned by GUINEVERE2 and McAfee
http://cheese.patlq.com/guinevere.htm 
Questions? [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
xxx

To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
With the following in the body of the message:
   unsubscribe SAlive
To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
With the following in the body of the message:
   unsubscribe SAlive


xxx
Ce message a �t� analys� par GUINEVERE2 et McAfee
This file was Scanned by GUINEVERE2 and McAfee
http://cheese.patlq.com/guinevere.htm
Questions? [EMAIL PROTECTED]
xxx

To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With the following in the body of the message:
   unsubscribe SAlive

Reply via email to