Spambayes is a so-called Bayesian filter (see http://www.paulgraham.com/spam.html) 
that does a weighted statistical analysis of the distribution of word tokens in mail 
each user classifies as "spam" or "ham" to calculate the probability that any new 
message is one or the other.

But also note that that message and your current one include the headers:

X-RBL-Warning: HELOBOGUS: Domain otmail1.oakleytech.com has no MX/A records.
X-RBL-Warning: REVDNS: This E-mail was sent from a MUA/MTA 204.254.177.162
        with no reverse DNS entry.
X-RBL-Warning: WEIGHT10: Weight of 12 reaches or exceeds the limit of 10.
X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [204.254.177.162]
X-Note: This E-mail was scanned by Declude JunkMail (www.declude.com) for
        spam.
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: HELOBOGUS, REVDNS, WEIGHT10



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Corey Horton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 1:46 pm
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SA-list] Hmmm
> 
> 
> btw, what filter setting did I trigger? Did I break the Woo Hoo! rule?
> 
> ;-)
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bell, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 1:00 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SA-list] Hmmm
> 
> 
> Calm down, Corey. You just triggered my spam filter's first 
> false positive.
> 
> http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Corey Horton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 12:56 pm
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [SA-list] Hmmm
> > 
> > 
> > Wooo Hooo!!!!! NOW THAT IS SERVICE!!!!!!!!!!!!
> > 
> > THANK YOU SOOOO MUCH!!!! Today, I was just about to begin the
> > tedious task of implementing one of the solutions that was 
> > suggested earlier, by John Rosiak (thanx again John). That 
> > is, to create a second alert for each existing alert that 
> > depends on the existing alert being down and to trigger the 
> > second alert every X cycles. This solution worked perfectly, 
> > as John described it. However, it is a lot of extra work and 
> > also uses up twice as many entries. I've been holding off on 
> > this and today, I returned to the list (been a little busy 
> > the past few days) to find my prayers answered. MUCH OBLIGED!!!
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jason Passow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 10:53 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [SA-list] Hmmm
> > 
> > 
> > Thank you very very much.
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 7:12 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [SA-list] Hmmm
> > 
> > Just added the following that could help:
> > 
> > 
> >     It's now possible to send the alert when a times down
> > and all b follow up down cycles
> >     
> >     Example:
> >     
> >             a=2 and b=3
> > 
> >             cycle 2,5,8,... will get the alert
> > 
> > 
> > http://www.woodstone.nu/soft/beta/salive4.exe (v4.0.1438 or
> > more recent)
> > 
> > 
> > dirk.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Fri Jun 13 6:06 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [SA-list] Hmmm
> > 
> > 
> > Also we're looking at it if we can add what Jason suggested.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > dirk.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Behalf Of Corey Horton
> > Sent: Fri Jun 13 6:00 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [SA-list] Hmmm
> > 
> > 
> > Ah ha! Now I knew someone out there had figured this out!
> > 
> > Thanx to all who responded. This forum is truly the best tech
> > support I've ever seen for a product...
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Rosiak, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 11:41 AM
> > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > Subject: RE: [SA-list] Hmmm
> > 
> > 
> > Corey and Jason,
> > 
> > One other alternative is to perform the same check as machine
> > down with a dependency on that check being down, e.g.
> >     Machine 1  - down  -- alert on 1st down (and back up too)
> >     Machine 1 down  (depends on previous entry being down) 
> > -- alert on 29th down (equates to 60 minutes on a 2 min. check)
> > 
> > Good luck,
> > John
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jason Passow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 11:18 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [SA-list] Hmmm
> > 
> > 
> > Corey I just sent a similar thread.  How I accomplish this
> > currently is one alert to alert when down 1 time (you can say 
> > two or three or
> > whatever) and then another identical alert to alert me every 
> > _ down cycles. Hopefully Dirk will take both of our emails 
> > and add an option for "When _ times down and every _ down 
> > cycles thereafter. "  This is reworded from my previous 
> > email.  I realized that I may not want to know the first time 
> > down (false positives etc) but perhaps 2 or three and every 
> > 10 after that. With multiple admins on our network it might 
> > get fixed before I am in a position to do something about it. 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Corey Horton
> > 
> > Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 10:09 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [SA-list] Hmmm
> > 
> > I would like Servers Alive to run on a 2-minute check cycle.
> > That is, run through it's checks every 2 minutes. If a 
> > machine is down, I'd like to be alerted immediately, and then 
> > every hour afterwards, until the machine is back up. Right 
> > now, I'm getting paged every 2 minutes.
> > 
> > I don't really want to go to the "When _ Times Down and All
> > Next Down Cycles" because it forces me to wait until I'm 
> > initially alerted (hope this makes sense).
> > 
> > Using the alert choices, how can I accomplish this?
> > 
> > ----------------------------------
> > Corey M. Horton, Consultant
> > ISG Solutions
> > 2400 Research Boulevard
> > Suite 350
> > Rockville, Maryland 20850
> > 301.519.3776
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message:
> >    unsubscribe SAlive
> > 
> > To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message:
> >    unsubscribe SAlive
> > To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message:
> >    unsubscribe SAlive
> > To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message:
> >    unsubscribe SAlive
> > 
> > To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message:
> >    unsubscribe SAlive
> > To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message:
> >    unsubscribe SAlive
> > 
> To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message:
>    unsubscribe SAlive
> To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message:
>    unsubscribe SAlive
> 
To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With the following in the body of the message:
   unsubscribe SAlive

Reply via email to