Interesting thought.. .I'll try that. Thanks!
Greg
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind CSC to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| "Mark Bradshaw" <bradshaw @staff.crosswalk.com> Sent by: salive-owner 11/21/2003 14:19
|
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject: RE: [SA-list] New type of check? |
Do a process check for explorer.exe. That shouldn't get launched until someone logs in.
Mark Bradshaw
Salem Web Network
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
9401 Courthouse Road, Suite 300
Chesterfield, VA 23832
804.768.9404 x123
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Greg A Weigold
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 1:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SA-list] New type of check?
I'm looking for a way to check to see if a server is up but not logged in... long story, don't ask!
I want to use PING as my "depends on" check, as the IPSTACK will answer pretty early in the boot process, but I can't figure out what to use to tell that the box is up but not logged in.
Thought I could tell using a service (like telnet) that I would then shutoff after login, but it looks as though some of those services don't start unless the box is logged in either.... or do they?
Anyone got any ideas?
And then I need a way to check for the absense of that something, and that absense would be OK... kind of a negative check, but negative check is OK.... Know what I mean?
Thanks
Greg Weigold
Life BPO eCommerce
CSC Blythewood,SC
