If you running reflecting without the scheduler, but still using the same
'script' does it give this too or not?

Also can you send me (off list) the "scripts" you're using? 


Dirk.
Don't forget to vote for Servers Alive in the annual Sunbelt Target Awards
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/targetawards/

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of David Wheeler
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 12:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Telnet, Start Checking, and 99% Utilization by SA
4.1R1591

Well, the problem I get is that it PERMANENTLY(until terminating the
program) ends up having 99% utilization when telneting into Servers
Alive:4301 using Reflection when scheduled via microsoft scheduler.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Roelofs
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 1:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Telnet, Start Checking, and 99% Utilization by SA
4.1R1591


We've got the same issue that ServerAlive is getting a 99% utilization
when checking on a W2K server, but i think it's normal because it's
doing it's tasks as quick as possible. Maybe it's an option that Sa uses
less CPU power ????? 


Met vriendelijke groet,
 
Mike Roelofs
UC Systems B.V.
E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens
Dirk Bulinckx
Verzonden: dinsdag 27 april 2004 21:07
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: RE: [SA-list] Telnet, Start Checking, and 99% Utilization by
SA 4.1R1591

Can you get the same behaviour using a telnet client (when doing it by
hand)? 


Dirk.
Don't forget to vote for Servers Alive in the annual Sunbelt Target
Awards http://www.sunbelt-software.com/targetawards/

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Michael Shook
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 9:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SA-list] Telnet, Start Checking, and 99% Utilization by SA
4.1R1591

Hmmmm, you know, I was doing some Telnet checks to SA on an old NT4 box
at the house. It seemed to do the same thing after several cycles. Never
looked into it further because it's such a crappy server, so I wasn't
completely surprised. But, maybe it's not the hardware...

Michael Shook
Technical Analyst
Saddle Creek Corporation
723 Joe Tamplin Industrial Blvd
Macon GA  31217
478 742 8740 ext. 105 (work)
478 256 9318 (mobile)
478 742 7917 (fax)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.saddlecrk.com

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/27/04 02:40PM >>>
I had a script that would log into Servers Alive at 1am and 6am via
telnet 4301 and issue the start checking command. 

That way if someone disabled the checking because we had the network/san
down but forgot to bring it back up, we'd still find out before 8am next
morning.

For some reason, servers alive seems to go to 99% utilization(at least
intermittently) when I do that.  I'm running the scripts using microsoft
2000 server edition scheduler and reflection.

I'm also running the latest version of SA Web.

I have turned off the scripts and the problem disappeared.

Suggestions?


The information contained in this email message may contain confidential
or legally privileged information and is intended solely for the use of
the named recipient(s).  No confidentiality or privilege is waived or
lost by any transmission error. If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, please immediately delete the e-mail and all copies
of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender either by telephone or return e-mail.  Any direct or indirect
use, disclosure, distribution, printing, or copying of any part of this
message is prohibited.  Any views expressed in this message are those of
the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the
sender is authorized to state them to be the views of XOMA.

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With the following in the body of the message:
   unsubscribe SAlive

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With the following in the body of the message:
   unsubscribe SAlive



---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With the following in the body of the message:
   unsubscribe SAlive

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With the following in the body of the message:
   unsubscribe SAlive


The information contained in this email message may contain confidential or
legally privileged information and is intended solely for the use of the
named recipient(s).  No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by
any transmission error. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, please immediately delete the e-mail and all copies of it from
your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the sender either by
telephone or return e-mail.  Any direct or indirect use, disclosure,
distribution, printing, or copying of any part of this message is
prohibited.  Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is
authorized to state them to be the views of XOMA.

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With the following in the body of the message:
   unsubscribe SAlive



---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With the following in the body of the message:
   unsubscribe SAlive

Reply via email to