Or, what about a similar case to have a check
performed ONLY if the dependor was in maintenance.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg A Weigold
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004
12:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Depends on
But if B already has a dependency on something else....
:-)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery.
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind CSC to any
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
"Dirk Bulinckx"
<dirk
@woodstone.nu>
Sent
by: salive-owner
10/14/2004 13:25
Please
respond to salive
|
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: RE: [SA-list]
Depends on
|
if b depends on a, and a is in maintenance, and b
will not be seen as down but as unavailable, that's already like that in the
current product....
Dirk.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg A Weigold
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 7:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Depends on
Well, if Server A was in maintenance, and Server B depended on it for access to
something (like FTP services), instead of reporting a down indicating Server B
was down, you might report UNAVAILABLE due to Server A (FTP Service) not
functioning... or some odd thing like that...
I guess that reporting something in MAINT instead of DOWN might make a big
difference in reporting statistics....
Greg
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery.
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind CSC to any
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
"Dirk Bulinckx"
<dirk
@woodstone.nu>
Sent by: salive-owner
10/14/2004 13:00
Please respond to salive
|
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: RE: [SA-list]
Depends on
|
What would be the use of that?
Dirk.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of gene Martinez
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 6:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Depends on
Has anyone thought or wanted/needed a check to depend on something being in
the maintenance mode? I know you have have the check depend on up or down,
but I was thinking you might want to have a check that depends on something
being in maintenance? Any thoughts?
Regards,
Gene
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.eclipse.net/~njkat
-------------------------
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With the following in the body of the message:
unsubscribe SAlive
-------------------------
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With the following in the body of the message:
unsubscribe SAlive
