Awesome! I'm holding my breath...
Ian
_________________________________
Ian K Gray
OEL IS - European Infrastructure Support
Tel: +44 1236 502661
Mob: +44 7881 518854
| Servers Alive Discussion
List <[email protected]>
12/05/2006 16:15
|
|
The multi-threading we will work like this:
if no entry depends on the entry and the entry itself is not depending on another entry that we will thread it (to start with "only" some check types like URL - PING - adding more).
You could get more checks per seconds/minute and the cycle time will be reduced but that doesn't mean that you would have more logging. The interval time (if you let that how it is) will still work in the same way.
Dirk Bulinckx.
From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 4:55 PM
To: Servers Alive Discussion List
Subject: [SA-list] SA Future Direction
Since everyone is weighing in, I have two add my two cents worth.
Multi-threading
It would be nice if SA ran a little faster, but be careful what you ask
for. We are currently running four checks per second. If that
number is significantly increased, I can foresee sizing problems with my
database where I log the output, network bandwidth issues and server performance
issues.
XML
I donât care. Always felt it was overrated.
Configuration Database
I think it is an excellent idea. It would be a good first step to
prepare for a remote administration tool. which I believe is extremely
important.
Output Database
This is also an excellent idea. Users could write their own reports,
generate their own html, and if desired can produce their own XML.
Jim Ferrell
EDS - Allison Transmission
4700 W 10th St
Mail Code 462-470-H04
Indianapolis, IN 46222
(
phone: +01-317-242-0034 (8-252)
+ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cell phone: 317-716-4541
To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to [email protected]
To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to [email protected]
To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to [email protected]
