IBM Blade server, Xeon 2.8Ghz, 2Gb RAM, running Win2K server. Checks are probably 60% PING, 30% SNMP, 10% other stuff (Win services, disk space etc). Maybe 50% on the local LAN, and 50% across a (reasonably fast) WAN.
We implemented all the tuning bits in the registry long time ago, although that never made a big difference. This is the first time I've seen a speed comparison - I'm staggered. Sounds like Michael is doing similar speeds to you, so evidence so far is pointing to the problem being here. If I could get checks going that fast it would revolutionise the process.
Ian
_________________________________
Ian K Gray
OEL IS - European Infrastructure Support
Tel: +44 1236 502661
Mob: +44 7881 518854
| Servers Alive Discussion
List <[email protected]>
12/05/2006 16:50
|
|
That seems REALLY slow. I was running over 1000 checks with many RRDs,
HTML generation, etc and I was never over 15 minutes. With some tuning
and pruning I cut that in half with recent betas.
What kind of hardware?
-Kevin
Servers Alive Discussion List wrote:
>
> Four checks per second??? How do you manage that? What sort of checks
> are they? I'd be pleased with 1 check per second! (Currently I'm
> running through about 360 checks in 15 mins - albeit including RRD
> generation which takes up a minute or three, and also recognising that
> checks over the WAN will take a bit longer).
>
> Ian
> _________________________________
> Ian K Gray
> OEL IS - European Infrastructure Support
> Tel: +44 1236 502661
> Mob: +44 7881 518854
>
>
> *Servers Alive Discussion List <[email protected]>*
>
> 12/05/2006 15:55
> Please respond to
> Servers Alive Discussion List <[email protected]>
>
>
>
> To
> Servers Alive Discussion List <[email protected]>
> cc
>
> Subject
> [SA-list] SA Future Direction
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Since everyone is weighing in, I have two add my two cents worth.
>
> Multi-threading
> It would be nice if SA ran a little faster, but be careful what you
> ask for. We are currently running four checks per second. If that
> number is significantly increased, I can foresee sizing problems with
> my database where I log the output, network bandwidth issues and
> server performance issues.
>
> XML
> I donââ¬â¢t care. Always felt it was overrated.
>
> Configuration Database
> I think it is an excellent idea. It would be a good first step to
> prepare for a remote administration tool. which I believe is extremely
> important.
>
> Output Database
> This is also an excellent idea. Users could write their own reports,
> generate their own html, and if desired can produce their own XML.
>
> Jim Ferrell
> EDS - Allison Transmission
> 4700 W 10th St
> Mail Code 462-470-H04
> Indianapolis, IN 46222
>
> ( phone: +01-317-242-0034 (8-252)
> + _mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cell phone: 317-716-4541
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to
> [email protected]
>
>
> To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to
> [email protected]
>
To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to [email protected]
To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to [email protected]
