On Mon, 18 Jan 1999, Simon Cooke wrote: > multiply that by a factor of 2 because each line's small... so make that > 1602K. > If people complain about performance, I may fix it - if not, there's no
I don't care about that (lots of memory free, even under Windows). The fact that I can't just use the Java JDK I've already got is bloody annoying, though, and means that I probably won't bother trying the program. Sorry.
