At 5:40 pm +0100 18/9/99, David Laundon wrote: >Going back to the bit you mentioned about screen contention being applied >across the whole line rather than just two thirds - how about reducing the >number of lines contended to 128 (2/3 of 192), so the overall slow down over >a frame is correct. This might be an acceptable bodge in the meantime...?
Gaggh! Surely anything that depends on that sort of exact contended timing would need accuracy over one line? I really, really doubt that averageing it over a frame would do a great deal to help... Andrew -- -- Andrew Collier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- My other -- http://mnemotech.ucam.org -- .sig is a -- Part 3 Materials Science, Cambridge -- PDF file --
