Well, if your still feel up for it :) Amithlon(AmigaOS on x86 layer)->Win2k (800kb/s) Win2k<-Amithlon(AmigaOS on x86 layer) (20-40Kb/s)
I could provide an debug level 9 output. Exotic things.. Find the NBSS checksum errors :) (Parser error in Ethereal ?) Also look how strange behaviour of windows size when you "get" a file from Amithlon. 17520 17520 ... 16... 16... Seems unsynched somehow ? The other way things seems smother with an stable windows size of 7300, like: tcp NBSS NBSS tcp ... http://www.birrabrothers.com/tiger/download/gettingafilefromamigaatawin2 kbox.capture Will reflect this, could be I'm confused with some basic tcp/ip thing.. But if your up to it =D Amiga port of smbfs works neat tho with high rates and you can even star/stop the interface in realtime, reboot other host etc =D So I think it's isolated to an Samba issue. Should I keep the list out of the thread now ? -- Ulf -----Original Message----- From: Esh, Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 4:42 PM To: Ulf Bertilsson; Esh, Andrew; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Very bad performance when copying large files from windows to samba-share I looked at the captures of win98 uploading to amithlon and redhat. They are not rabbit-pellet mode. The protocol is using full sized packets, 64K chunks, and has between two and four packets on the wire at a time. There are no flush commands present, which is the main characteristic of the slow transfer mode. Those two transfers appear to be operating rather quickly, with end-to-end response time in the 6-10ms range, and streamed packet intervals around 30us. I measured one 64K chunk taking 260ms to be transferred, which is close to a 2Mb/S transfer rate. Is there something else I should look at? -----Original Message----- From: Ulf Bertilsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:54 AM To: Esh, Andrew; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Very bad performance when copying large files from windows to samba-share Importance: Low I finaly got the mashine up and running again =D If it's still interesting here is a download point for captures.. http://www.birrabrothers.com/tiger/download/ I'm puzzeled over that I also have this error in win2k. -- Ulf -----Original Message----- From: Esh, Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 4:15 PM To: Ulf Bertilsson; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Very bad performance when copying large files from windows to samba-share Please send a copy of any tcpdumps to me as well, if you would. I spent a lot of time characterizing the Rabbit Pellet transfer mode. I'll recognize it right away, if that is what this is. -----Original Message----- From: Ulf Bertilsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 3:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Very bad performance when copying large files from windows to samba-share Importance: Low > > Just out of curiosity, what did security=server contribute: > > added latency in some obscure part of the process??? > > As far as we could tell... yes. ;) > > I really should have documented that whole episode. I have an current "issue" with Samba 2.0.7 and an Win98 box. Peak at ~800kb/s one way, 20-30kb/s other way (10MB enviroment) I have some captures I will show Chris. Could be relevant in this contex.. Otherwise, sorry for the OT :) -- Ulf
