Please if even we pass functionality to net make it so it does not need a running samba to work for local management as current utilities do.
Simo. On Fri, 2002-07-26 at 16:18, Gerald Carter wrote: > On Fri, 19 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > When working on some enumeration code for net tool, I faced with > > choice of doing some routines by "local" or "rpc" means. > > Some of 'net' functionalities could be useful when done locally > > instead of rpc calls only. > > Hence I'd like to raise the question: Is it good moment to > > start 'net local' group of subroutines or rather leave it to > > rpc calls and move "local" functionality to other tools, like > > e.g. pdbedit ? > > > > Comments (as always) are appreciated. > > Good question. I don't know. For linking sanity, i would > tend to fall on the "Keep local tools out of net", but i could be > convinced otehrwise..... > > > > > > > > > > cheers, jerry > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Hewlett-Packard http://www.hp.com > SAMBA Team http://www.samba.org > -- http://www.plainjoe.org > "Sam's Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours" 2ed. ISBN 0-672-32269-2 > --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- > > -- Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Xsec s.r.l. via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
