Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> Please if even we pass functionality to net make it so it does not need
> a running samba to work for local management as current utilities do.
Might I restate that as
1) "there should be one way to do the adiminstrative
operations", and
2) "the mechanism should have at least one interface
that can be used without a daemon in operation".
The first enables the second, which ensures that
you can acheive the same end: I'll ignore the
debate about single-command vs seperation of
function (;-))
--dave
--
David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify
Performance & Engineering | some people and astonish the rest.
Americas Customer Engineering, | -- Mark Twain
(905) 415-2849 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
