>No, the idea is that one SAM backend would know about only one domain, >but that we could have multiple domains, each with their own backend. >For smbd it doesn't make much sense, except that I was looking at >handling 'builtin' stuff by abstraction into a separate 'domain' this >way. (I favor putting special cases into modules, rather than in >interfaces).
FWIW, this is what Active Directory does (cf. builtinDomain in the schema). -- Luke -- Luke Howard | PADL Software Pty Ltd | www.padl.com
