> > > > Well, I'm starting to think our syntax is just getting too complex. > All > > > > the 'solutions' for putting 'domain' in there just look ugly!
> > > > Some poor admin has to construct this line, and even if they don't > use > > > > multidomain stuff (and that's almost everybody), then have to read > the > > > > doco that attempts to explain it. > > > > I think we should remove the DOMAIN bit compleatly, and allow > backends > > > > to store both their own SID and thier domain name. If they don't > 'know' > > > > it, then they can either chose the default, or use a 'parametric > option' > > > > to specify it. > > > What about using the WORKGROUP parameter as the default domain vallue? > > > And an extra parameter like "multiple domain support = > > > False|DOMAIN1,DOMAIN2,etc"? > > > It's just an idea, I am not a developper myself tough. > > What domainname/domainsid would belong to what sam backend then...? > Like I've said, I'm not a developer, but maybe the "multiple domain support" > parameter could be extended with the backend method? > Like this: > "multiple domain support = DOMA:backendA, DOMB:backendB, etc" > But I guess this will be to long too. That is actually the way 'sam backends' is at the moment... Jelmer
