On Mon, 30 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > * The other alternative is to move the (not too big) groupdb API > entirely to the passdb backend. This would make it possible to get > LDAP replication for group mapping quite easily. We could encapsulate > LDAP (with connection caching.... ;-) in one file. > > * Design of LDAP replication: What about a sambaGroup objectclass as > supplementary to posixGroup that contains gid, sid, ntname, > grouptype, comment etc? All the stuff that mapping.c stores in the > tdb.
Both of these ideas sound fine to me.... cheers, jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- Hewlett-Packard http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team http://www.samba.org -- http://www.plainjoe.org "SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours" 2ed. ISBN 0-672-32269-2 --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca--
