On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 09:42:02AM -0500, Gerald Carter wrote: > On Mon, 30 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > * The other alternative is to move the (not too big) groupdb API > > entirely to the passdb backend. This would make it possible to get > > LDAP replication for group mapping quite easily. We could encapsulate > > LDAP (with connection caching.... ;-) in one file. > > > > * Design of LDAP replication: What about a sambaGroup objectclass as > > supplementary to posixGroup that contains gid, sid, ntname, > > grouptype, comment etc? All the stuff that mapping.c stores in the > > tdb. > > Both of these ideas sound fine to me....
Sounds fine to me. Andrew Bartlett
