While convenient for web browsers, it's not exactly backwards-compatible for both GPG and the average sysadmin who's probably struggling with verifying PGP signatures for the first time. It's not Samba's fault; GPG just isn't very descriptive in it's error message, which is somewhat misleading.
But then that's just me talking... ;-) On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 13:26:42 -0800 or thereabouts, Herb Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This renaming was to work around a browser problem where browsers > would think any file with a .gz anywhere in the path was a > gzipped file. > > When the filenames differ use > > gpg --verify samba-2.2.7a_tar_gz.asc samba-2.2.7a.tar.gz
