On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 10:34:24AM -0600, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: > > While convenient for web browsers, it's not exactly backwards-compatible > > for both GPG and the average sysadmin who's probably struggling with > > verifying PGP signatures for the first time. It's not Samba's fault; > > GPG just isn't very descriptive in it's error message, which is somewhat > > misleading. > > > > But then that's just me talking... ;-) > > Good point. I'll update the download page to make a note of it. > > in retrospect, it might have been better to sign the tarball. So there > would be one signature for both the gzipped and bzipped copy. You would > just have to decompress the archive before verifying the signature.
Nice one. That would also solve the browser filename problem too. Tim.
