On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 06:54:37AM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote: > On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Vance Lankhaar wrote: > > > What about adding a value to the printing param? -> "printing = > > disabled" > > This seems like a good way to do it. Does anyone have any objections if I > do so?
Why do we need it? Just call lp_default_server_announce() and check if the SV_TYPE_PRINTQ_SERVER bit is set. If no print shares are exported then don't call nt_printing_backend_init(). I don't think we need yet another parameter when the information is already available. Tim.
