On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 10:25:27PM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote: > > > > > This seems like a good way to do it. Does anyone have any objections if I > > > > > do so? > > > > > > > > Why do we need it? Just call lp_default_server_announce() and check if > > > > the SV_TYPE_PRINTQ_SERVER bit is set. If no print shares are exported > > > > then don't call nt_printing_backend_init(). > > > > > > Hmmm, Samba 2.2.x sets SV_TYPE_PRINTQ_SERVER unconditionaly. > > > > It's fixed in HEAD. > > Yeah, well someone forgot their janitorial duties :-)
There's an interesting story about that. (-: At the time I fixed this problem we were in "don't touch the 2.2 branch unless it is a critical bug fix", and also in "this will be the last version of 2.2 for sure" mode. I guess we are still in both those conditions again at the moment! Here's the original problem report: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/2002-May/036866.html Tim.
